Not Intelligent, and Surely Not Science
I just noticed a link to this L.A. Times article on Arts & Letters Daily.
Not Intelligent, and Surely Not Science: "In fact, invoking intelligent design as God's place-filler can only result in the naturalization of the deity. God becomes just another part of the natural world, and thereby loses the transcendent mystery and divinity that define the boundary between religion and science."
Not Intelligent, and Surely Not Science: "In fact, invoking intelligent design as God's place-filler can only result in the naturalization of the deity. God becomes just another part of the natural world, and thereby loses the transcendent mystery and divinity that define the boundary between religion and science."
posted by Michael C. Habib at 4/03/2005 10:30:00 PM
1 Comments:
It is available through Lexis Nexis Academic. Here is the full information about the article:
Copyright 2005 Los Angeles Times All Rights Reserved
Los Angeles Times
March 30, 2005 Wednesday
Home Edition
SECTION: CALIFORNIA; Metro; Editorial Pages Desk; Part B; Pg. 11
LENGTH: 862 words
HEADLINE: Commentary;
Not Intelligent, and Surely Not Science
BYLINE: Michael Shermer, Michael Shermer is founding publisher of Skeptic magazine and the author of "Science Friction: Where the Known Meets the Unknown"
(Times Books, 2005).
While I was looking that up, I found the letters to the editor in response to the editorial. Those are also available in Lexis Nexis and here is the information about those:
Copyright 2005 Los Angeles Times
All Rights Reserved
Los Angeles Times
April 1, 2005 Friday
Home Edition
SECTION: CALIFORNIA; Metro; Editorial Pages Desk; Part B; Pg. 12
LENGTH: 649 words
HEADLINE: LETTERS TO THE TIMES ;
Point and Counterpoint on 'Intelligent Design'
Post a Comment
<< Home